The world’s most successful governments increasingly build their decisions on data. The United Kingdom’s Behavioural Insights Team, Estonia’s digital public administration and Singapore’s evidence-based urban development all show the same thing: measurement and feedback produce better results than ideological conviction.
What is the situation in Hungary?
Most Hungarian policy decisions continue to rest on anecdotal experience, political bargains or ideological considerations. A few concrete problems:
- Lack of impact assessment — Laws are passed without measuring their expected consequences
- Programmes without feedback — Multi-billion-forint support programmes run for years without evaluation
- Closed data — Data of public interest is hard to access, making independent analysis impossible
What does MIAK propose?
We consider three principles necessary:
- Every policy measure must be tied to measurable goals — what do we want to achieve, by when, and how will we measure it?
- Public data — research, statistics and background materials financed from public funds should be freely accessible
- Regular impact assessment — passing a law is not enough; whether it works has to be measured
Data-drivenness is not a technical question — it is the foundation of democratic accountability.
This is not a utopia. This is a method. And this is precisely what we are building our programme on.
Comments
The comment system will be available soon.